|
Here is a rather novel and awakening way to gently persuade one towards the understanding of the new ‘Time' (RBT) conjecture. It is derived from an analysis of Bell's Theorem (postscript #05) and discussions of the Fundamental Physics Group at the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, California. 1) The statistical predictions of Quantum Mechanics (QM) are incorrect. This is ridiculous, millions of experiments indicate that the Theory of QM has never failed. 2) The Principle of Local Causes Fails. a) Contrafactual Definitness (CD) Fails. The two assumptions of CD are firstly, free will and secondly, when we choose to do one thing in place of another, "what would have happened if . ." would have produced definite results (G.Zukav, The Dancing Wu Li Masters, p 317). c) If the first assumption (free will) fails, this leads to 'superdeterminism' (not only, once the initial situation of a system is established, the future of the system also is established because of the laws of cause and effect, but also, not even the initial situation of the universe could be changed). d) If the second assumption fails this leads to the Many Worlds Conjecture. Both of these are quite unacceptable to most physicists. Free will (observers can choose between possible experiments) exists by statistical analysis of behavior, superdeterminism does not fit modern communications data and to have the world continuously splitting into "mutually inaccessible branches" is unprovable, seemingly not approaching "principles governing correct or reliable inference." b) Locality Fails. THIS MUST BE IT! But neither was Einstein incorrect for no energy and no mass can move faster than light (by the foolproof proven theory of Special Relativity). There must be a subdivision of the locality concept as follows: e) Locality of mass/energy does not fail. f) LOCALITY OF ‘INFORMATION' DOES FAIL. Thus, this postulate (besides an untenable paradigm B: Models of Reality being Impossible), becomes the only supporting evidence for Bell's theorem. That the locality of information fails can only mean that "something" without mass and without energy can behave as if it is superluminal and the only such thing so far conjectured in the annals of theoretical physics is ‘orthogonal time' or RBT. One asks why it MUST be orthogonal and the answer seems straightforward as follows: A) Associated "timetags" (postscript #109) are additive and B) Total ‘TIME' (‘t' + RBT) has a boundary condition that its net value cannot measure back from the future into the past or that it cannot move in the net direction of negentropy. This latter condition is thought to be possibly coupled to the discovery of universe expansion. By e) above, conventional "t-timetags" cannot be superluminal because they are associated with energy and mass but RBC information encoded in "External Lateness" (outside the receiver) can be transduced into information encoded in "Internal Lateness" and the latter can, in very short periods of conventional time ‘t,' be forced (biochemically we presume) into, or near to, "Internal On Timeness" reducing the numerical value of the received RBT and thus (by its equivalence to displacement divided by velocity), the information obtains all of the physical properties of being superluminal. If physical displacement remains relatively constant then "Internal RBT" is inversely proportional to external "information velocity" and we presume that there has been long standing evolutionary selection pressure for "Internal RBT" to reduce to near zero for some messages. |